The minute you think investing in a mobile application, you're instantlychallenged with a bombardment of terminology. What are native and hybrid mobile apps? More significantly, which is most suitable for your app?
apps are what classicallyspring to mind when you think of an app. You download them from the App Store or Google Play, they lie within your mobile device and you run them by clicking their icon.
The bestfundamental way to develop a native app for mobile device is to code them for a precise kind of device. For example, iPhone apps are written in Objective-C, Android apps in Java, etc.
The convincing list of benefits makes native apps as the most favoredin mobile app development. More challenging apps such as games lean to be coded and developed natively to take full benefit of the device's capabilities and broader functionality.
Web apps are basically "THE PERFECT". If you are in a situation to get a native app developed, there's genuinely no reason not to.
Somewhere amongst mobile and web apps are hybrid apps. They are faster to build (and thus inexpensive) than native apps, but a step up from what you can anticipate out of a browser-based web app.
Selected small native code is used, to permit the app to access the broader functionality of the device (but not complete functionality) and generate a more sophisticated user experience. For native apps, only native code is used.
As far as user experience is concerned, most people perhaps won't predict a gigantic difference from a native app -- predominantly if there isn't a substantial interactive component to your app.
If a native app is unachievable, a hybrid app is the clear second choice and a close challenger. Their cost makes them more comprehensible to smaller organizations, but they are still repeatedly used by big businesses. Still, optimizing the "web" part of the app to run native-like on the most widespread platforms and devices will take significant time and investment - many companies who were sold on the benefits of hybrid eventually found out they had to spend so much time and money in optimizing them than a native approach from the start would have turned out to be more cheaper and economical.